DOMAIN NAME DISPUTE RESOLUTION: WIPO’S GOOD PRACTICE FOR RUSSIA

  • Sergo Anton Gennadyevich Russian State Academy of Intellectual Property
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/tis.2021.13072
Keywords: domain names, domains, trademarks, jurisprudence, Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation, Court of Intellectual Property Rights, World Intellectual Property Organization, Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy, UDRP

Abstract

recently, more and more attention has been paid to domain names in scientific works and judicial practice. The apparent scarcity of legal regulation of this object forces us to turn to foreign experience, fragmentarily borrowing it in theory and judicial practice. However, this approach does not provide a vision of a holistic picture of international domain dispute settlement systems, most of which have been successfully operating for over 20 years without any government involvement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Sergo Anton Gennadyevich, Russian State Academy of Intellectual Property

Recently, more and more attention has been paid to domain names in scientific works and judicial practice. The apparent scarcity of legal regulation of this object forces us to turn to foreign experience, fragmentarily borrowing it in theory and judicial practice. However, this approach does not provide a vision of a holistic picture of international domain dispute settlement systems, most of which have been successfully operating for over 20 years without any government involvement.

Published
2021-04-14
Issue
Vol 37 No 1-2 (2021): SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF UNESCO CHAIR ON COPYRIGHT, RELATED, CULTURAL AND INFORMATION RIGHTS
Section
Intellectual property rights