CRITICAL ASPECTS OF THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE LEGAL PROFESSION
Abstract
What is the current and potential relationship between automated processing tools for legally relevant data and the performance of the legal profession? Is it possible to consider whether there is a potential for synergy, integration, or alternation between classical human legal activities and procedurally designed algorithmic processes? What definitions and control mechanisms would be required for the potential avenues of inquiry into this subject, given the need to comply with existing principles and guarantees?
Downloads
References
Grimolizzi G. Lucilla Gatt: “In Italia finora non si è andati oltre l’uso della digitalizzazione del dato legale”// Ildubbio. 2023. October23
Cf. Morelli C. Intelligenza artificiale. Essere avvocati nell’era di ChatGPT. Maggioli: Santarcangelo di Ro-magna, 2024.
Chomsky N., Roberts I., WatumullJ. The False Promise of ChatGPT// The New York Times. 2023. March8.
Grimolizzi G. L’IA non va subita ma governata, o il linguaggio giuridico perderà la propria ricchezza// Ildubbio. 2023. October23.
Piana D., Viciconte G. Un’intelligenza artificiale attenta ai diritti? Sì, se controllata dagli avvocati// Il dubbio. 2023. October23.